<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Choose USM over UM?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tempinis.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/why-choose-usm-over-um/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tempinis.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/why-choose-usm-over-um/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:03:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: godDAMNU</title>
		<link>http://tempinis.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/why-choose-usm-over-um/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>godDAMNU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempinis.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-548</guid>
		<description>plZ....GO TO HELLL!!!!!UM HAS MORE HITS B&#039;COZ ITS HAS A LONGER HISTORY THAN USM,WHO DO U THINK U ARE TO JUDGE????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>plZ&#8230;.GO TO HELLL!!!!!UM HAS MORE HITS B&#8217;COZ ITS HAS A LONGER HISTORY THAN USM,WHO DO U THINK U ARE TO JUDGE????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hassan Craig</title>
		<link>http://tempinis.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/why-choose-usm-over-um/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Hassan Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempinis.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-494</guid>
		<description>How educating, it&#039;s totally a thread to read more of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How educating, it&#8217;s totally a thread to read more of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toru</title>
		<link>http://tempinis.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/why-choose-usm-over-um/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>toru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempinis.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-465</guid>
		<description>AKA - how about showing your figures?  Your statements do not reveal (a) the figures; (b) why my searches are wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AKA &#8211; how about showing your figures?  Your statements do not reveal (a) the figures; (b) why my searches are wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKA</title>
		<link>http://tempinis.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/why-choose-usm-over-um/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>AKA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempinis.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-463</guid>
		<description>Obviously you do not know exactly how to use ISI. Of course a proper validation (especially on number of publication) has been made by the committee. I have seen the figures (don&#039;t have at hand) but definitely USM is the clear winner. You can get different numbers with ISI if your search strategy is wrong. Try to get a trained librarian to help and you will see the truth will prevail. Mind you, there are many aspects for the evaluation - publication is only one of them. I&#039;m sorry to dissapoint you but this is the truth, nothing but the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously you do not know exactly how to use ISI. Of course a proper validation (especially on number of publication) has been made by the committee. I have seen the figures (don&#8217;t have at hand) but definitely USM is the clear winner. You can get different numbers with ISI if your search strategy is wrong. Try to get a trained librarian to help and you will see the truth will prevail. Mind you, there are many aspects for the evaluation &#8211; publication is only one of them. I&#8217;m sorry to dissapoint you but this is the truth, nothing but the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www bpa jpm my</title>
		<link>http://tempinis.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/why-choose-usm-over-um/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>www bpa jpm my</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempinis.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-441</guid>
		<description>ko yem binjai 19, 500 hits
republic of malaysia (written by ko yem binjai) is 133,000,000 hits

you are tagged.
they are tagged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ko yem binjai 19, 500 hits<br />
republic of malaysia (written by ko yem binjai) is 133,000,000 hits</p>
<p>you are tagged.<br />
they are tagged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toru</title>
		<link>http://tempinis.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/why-choose-usm-over-um/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>toru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempinis.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Hi Chow Yang

Thanks for your comments.  But I dont think your point undermines my argument at all.  Even if taking &quot;Sains Malaysia&quot; as the more accurate &quot;hits&quot; figure, the number shown is still 3,000 &quot;hits&quot; behind the search with the keyword &quot;Malaya&quot;.  And you suggest that out of the 4,000 &quot;hits&quot;, 500 belongs to a single superstar professor. 

As I said in the post, I remain open to suggestion why this conclusion is wrong.  I am not persuaded at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chow Yang</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.  But I dont think your point undermines my argument at all.  Even if taking &#8220;Sains Malaysia&#8221; as the more accurate &#8220;hits&#8221; figure, the number shown is still 3,000 &#8220;hits&#8221; behind the search with the keyword &#8220;Malaya&#8221;.  And you suggest that out of the 4,000 &#8220;hits&#8221;, 500 belongs to a single superstar professor. </p>
<p>As I said in the post, I remain open to suggestion why this conclusion is wrong.  I am not persuaded at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Chow Yang</title>
		<link>http://tempinis.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/why-choose-usm-over-um/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Chow Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempinis.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Go to ISI Web of Science.  Try searching Fun Hoong Kun and sains malaysia together.  For Professor Fun alone, you should get a hit of &gt;500 papers.  Thus something is really wrong with your hit of 160.  Maybe that is because you type &#039;University Sains Malaysia&#039; when you should be typing &#039;Universiti Sains Malaysia&#039;.  Your search on &#039;sains malaysia&#039; is probably more accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to ISI Web of Science.  Try searching Fun Hoong Kun and sains malaysia together.  For Professor Fun alone, you should get a hit of &gt;500 papers.  Thus something is really wrong with your hit of 160.  Maybe that is because you type &#8216;University Sains Malaysia&#8217; when you should be typing &#8216;Universiti Sains Malaysia&#8217;.  Your search on &#8217;sains malaysia&#8217; is probably more accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
